Pre-Race Exams Included in Proposed West Virginia Racing Rules

The West Virginia Senate passed an overhaul of the state's horse racing regulations Feb. 25, which include mandatory pre-race veterinary exams for horses.

The revisions have met with some opposition from horsemen and breeders who claim their suggestions, as well as concerns from veterinarians, weren't regarded. The rules now go to the House Judiciary Committee for review and action; the West Virginia legislative session ends March 12.

Along with mandatory pre-race exams, which are required for any track to receive accreditation from the National Thoroughbred Racing Association Safety and Integrity Alliance, the rules list testing threshold levels for drug contaminants and implement tougher penalties for drug offenses; a 116-pound minimum weight for jockeys, not including sex or apprentice allowances; allow trainers to enter more than one horse in an overnight race as long as others are excluded; and allow for uncoupled entries in stakes.

One official said the revised rules of racing, which have been in the works for more than a year, required give and take. Nationally, industry officials responded favorably to the changes.

"We commend the West Virginia legislature for its recognition that pre-race examinations are vitally important to help ensure the safety of both human and equine athletes," Safety Alliance executive director Mike Ziegler said. "Pre-race exams are mandatory for alliance accreditation and should be implemented at every racetrack for every horse in every race."

West Virginia deputy attorney general Kelli Talbott, who handles West Virginia Racing Commission (WVRC) business, said Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races in Charles Town, W.Va.,, has been performing the exams for several months, though they aren't yet required by statue or rules.

Scot Waterman, DVM, executive director of the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium (RMTC), said he worked "extensively" with Talbott and the WVRC to upgrade medication rules so they are more closely aligned with RMTC model rules.

"As I understand it, the mandate when this started was to update the West Virginia rules to conform as close to as possible with the model rules--and not just medication--which is what I tried to help them do," Waterman said. "It was an enormous project but I believe the final product brings West Virginia in line with the majority of (RMTC model rules for medication)."

Some horsemen said they believe the proposed medication rules go too far and could threaten West Virginia racing.

"Our commission and their attorney believe that they know what's best for the men and women and horses of our business and not the partnership industry that I believe we should have, much like a three-legged stool with horsemen, racetracks, and government making up those legs," one individual said.

Originally posted on BloodHorse.com.

About the Author

Tom LaMarra

Tom LaMarra, a native of New Jersey and graduate of Rutgers University, has been news editor at The Blood-Horse since 1998. After graduation he worked at newspapers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania as an editor and reporter with a focus on municipal government and politics. He also worked at Daily Racing Form and Thoroughbred Times before joining The Blood-Horse. LaMarra, who has lived in Lexington since 1994, has won various writing awards and was recognized with the Old Hilltop Award for outstanding coverage of the horse racing industry. He likes to spend some of his spare time handicapping races.

Stay on top of the most recent Horse Health news with FREE weekly newsletters from TheHorse.com. Learn More

Free Newsletters

Sign up for the latest in:

From our partners