Readers Weigh in on Low-Cost Euthanasia Clinics

More than 2,370 readers of TheHorse.com responded to a poll asking, "Do you think low-cost equine euthanasia clinics should be widely available?"

results of poll on low-cost euthanasia

Results were as follows: 
  • Yes: 89.08% (2,112)
  • No: 5.69% (135)
  • I don't know: 5.23% (124)

Read more about a planned low-cost euthanasia clinic.  

Results of weekly polls from TheHorse.com are published in The Horse Health E-Newsletter. Published every week, this e-newsletter offers news on diseases, veterinary research, health events, and in-depth articles on common equine health conditions and what you can do to recognize, avoid, or treat them. Sign up for our e-newsletters using the form above or on our e-newsletter page.  

Look for a new poll on TheHorse.com every week!


  • sometimes people cant afford to have ahorse put down
  • when it is time and cost is a factor
  • As long as healthy horses aren't euthanized for the convenience of the owner.
  • Rather one should have lower cost equine euthanasia at all times. Or, use a more economical method
  • This is a viable option for those who can't afford a vet or renderer
  • many horses are left to suffer unneccesarily when the owners are not able to afford euthansia.
  • but the vet should always give a tranquilizer first as it greatly improves the process and costs lit
  • If the slaughter plants are closes, there has to be other options for protection of the horses
  • to end the suffering
  • I have learned the big problem is finding what to do with the body!
  • I think people need to have a reality check. Nothing can live forever. It comes down to quality of
  • yes, low cost & no cost & disposal
  • the risk of inhumane euthanasia is too high
  • This would prevent the suffering of many horses whose owners do not have endless financial resources
  • With rising costs many owners cannot care for horses and no one else will take them..cruel to starve
  • Any help for unwantted horses is needed. Horses are starving becauood owners can't afford to feed.
  • I personally feel that to have to make that decision is hard enough
  • This is a far better alternative to starvation
  • A bad option, but better than letting a horse suffer
  • It might make it too easy.
  • not for breeders or the financially able tht just can't selthem because of market conditions
  • poeple need an out when they can't afford to keep them, and don't want to send them to an auction
  • Equine vets can handle euthanasia like small animal vets. It must be justified though.
  • It would save much suffering
  • because of cost, horses are left dying painfully, when a quick procedure would be best for the horse
  • depending on what method they use for euthanasia
  • humane euthanasia should never be done without the presence of a licensed vet
  • body disposal???
  • yes, and let's have the breed associations fund it with a fee for each new registration.
  • Too many people are going to abuse it.
  • euthanasia, not slaughter plants
  • The anit-salughter bill was the worst thing for horses.
  • A quick death is better than one slowed by starvation or lack of care.
  • However, if euthanasia due to abuse/mistreatment, person not allowed to own another horse
  • Horses have gotten so cheap people in my area wouldn't spen the gas to take to vet just let die
  • No one likes to see a horse put down. I think we need to do it in a humane manner.
  • It is still outrageous to have to poison horses just because they are horses instead of using the me
  • I belive horses should be given the chance to die with dignity. It is the least we can do for them.
  • This is a double-edged sword. I'd rather hear of a horse put down then starving to death.
  • It is painful enough to lose the horse, let alone to pay for a dead horse
  • If available, maybe people wouldn't turn loose or let those equines suffer that need to be put down
  • Especially in areas where there are large horse populations.
  • Tho an unpleasant prospect, it beats abandonment into starvation or other slow painful deaths
  • but only for horses that can't be saved; not used to just get rid of an unwanted horse
  • It's better than slaughter.
  • For those who don't have another means of ending a life. Thankfully we can still dispose ourselves
  • There is an obvious need; euthanasia is more humane than slaughter.
  • Too many can't afford the cost of euthanasia and disposal - this is a good idea
  • far better to die humanely than at the killers' hands
  • I love horses but also agree there is to many horses in rescue that should be euthanized.
  • COUNTIES SHOULD PROVIDE EUTHANASIA AND BURIAL AT LANDFILLS.WILLING TO PAY MORE TAX FOR SERVICE.
  • Also low cost cremation. No tallow company or dump for faithful pals.
  • It costs $300 here to put fown and dispose of horses.
  • Every horse deserves a peaceful end.
  • Ranchers all know the most cost effective method ......
  • In order to provide a humane,dignified death for horses instead of the slaughter house .
  • As the economy gets worse and it will, people will be forced to do the unthinkable! Help for the own
  • white horses
  • Absolutely. This service shold be provided in the same ways it is offered fo small companion animals
  • not thru rescues! NorCal sell valuable horses & kill others while adding to record # of rescued"
  • Not Widely available. That would only encourage more irresponsible breeding.
  • better than to let or allow suffering
  • We have few horse vets in this area and most will not euthanis a healthy horse.
  • Humane euthanasia NOT slaughter!
  • People should reconsider breeding their horses; overpopulation & lack of competent potential owners
  • right now there is no other humane treatment available
  • it is better than suffering and starvation becuase owners can't afford their horse anymore
  • only because he may be more humane then transporting horses to slaughter houses which is tragic
  • there needs to be an alternative to brutal slaughter.
  • No, slaughter facilities
  • We had no problem with this until ignorant people got involved.
  • Local vets should provide low cost help with euthanasia of unwanted or unhealthy horses.
  • Because many people cannot afford this, some horses spend their end-lives in pain and/or starvation.
  • I've had to put many animals down, but my last experience was the worst, I don't think I can rec. it
  • with the qualification that the need for euthanasia be evaluated case by case
  • I think they should re-open the "killer-plants" and make use of the animals instead of just killing
  • Somany unwanted or unaffordable horses are left in fields to wither away to eat droughted grass. If
  • Without the availability of slaughter houses we need to be able to humanely put down unwanted horses
  • I'd rather shot them &use ther meat.
  • This alternative should be mandated by Fed and State law.
  • these clinics would be better than any alternative
  • open the slaughter houses and we wouldn't have to waste good flesh that could be feeding the hungry
  • There should be a more affordable way to euthanize horses to eliminate the mistreatment of them.
  • There has to be a low cost alternative otherwise more will starve to death.
  • In this economy it is better they be euthanized than starved to death if owners can't feed them.
  • It would help a lot of owners who have an ailing horse be able to end thier suffering in a humanely
  • Especially now that we no longer have slaughter facilities
  • euthanasia is a more humane and more responsible way to take care of "unwanted" horses
  • absolutely not- would make it too easy
  • I think we should have horse slaughter houses
  • it's a lot better than allowing them to starve or run free
  • There would be less suffering if an owner could pay $25 instead of $100+disposal.
  • i had a good vet and thought only they could do it
  • There is always hope;a horse shouldn't have to be denied living because of a lack of $ from an owner
  • In extreme cases of need, screened for neglect we might be able to end some suffering, abusable
  • yes i am tired of trying to save my neighbors horses from starving-i would pay their euth fee
  • Many people keep a horse that needs to be euthanized just because they cannot afford the cost of eut
  • could lessen need for slaughter facilities - but don't look at it as a replacement.
  • the unfortunate does happen and I wouldn't want one of my horses to suffer longer than it really has
  • Vote yes. Painless death is humane where as starving and slaughter is torture!
  • It will end a suffering that would otherwise be there and if they adopt some horses all the better.
  • Wouldn't that be great if this was an available option everywhere thru a national agreement of vets
  • Definitely yes. Too much suffering going on now without the slaughter houses.
  • NO WAY, people would use them like abortion clinics, kill off that horse and buy a new one!
  • Please - we need some option, other than starvation and neglect!
  • This could be the answer to Humane Harvesting Facilities in every state. An excellent solution.
  • Horses can not be left to suffer, low cost euthanasia os an alternative to slaughter for food.
  • Horses suffer when care can't be provided. Low-cost euthanasia is a better alternative than sufferin
  • I think it will only promote potential abuse.
  • It would save hundreds of horses from suffering from inproper care, and abuse.
  • Guns are available for those so disposed to kill their animals rather than take care of them.
  • If someone has a horse that needs to be put down because of a medical condition, I think that they a
  • There are so many horses that need to be euthanised but the owner can't afford it
  • We have an overbundance of all animals and unwanted animals should not have to suffer from costs
  • u have people out there trying to put them down an messing up bad & the animal suffers, its not fair
  • absolutely!
  • It is one way to stop horses from being sent to slaughter.
  • However, controlled slaughter houses would be better - horses are livestock - remember!
  • In NW FL people lead them into the woods and shoot them. Can't afford other options.
  • maybe more horses would suffer less if owners had such an option - better to end life than to suffer
  • Sad but true - better a humane end to suffer than a slaughter yard or continued suffering
  • We certainly need an alternative to starvation.
  • It is sad t think of any animal being euthanized but often the alternative is much worse.
  • the price of fuel & hay has made many people unable to support them
  • Open slaughter houses after insuring humane, enforceable laws
  • The cost of euthanasia should be the responsibility of the owner, but some may need assistance
  • And for small animals too!!!
  • Would need specific criteria and regulations in place.
  • yes, yes, yes
  • This may stop some from taking a horse to auction because they don't want to spend the money to have
  • I would rather euthanasia than animals being abandoned in the desert to die of thirst or starvation.
  • I would rather see this than horses abandoned in the desert to die of thirst or starvation.
  • disposal also..may save some horses from starving....or better yet bring back humane slaughter in US
  • It is more cruel to let the horse suffer. It's not morally right but better than a slow death.
  • Horses shouldn't have to suffer because the owners can't or won't spend the money to put them down.
  • Why not? We have it for our small pets. I want to know there's someone to help my horses when needed
  • Sadly if they can't be adopted, this would be better than starvation.
  • It would save a lot of pain for animal and owner.
  • For only the horsse that really need to be put down!
  • With slaughter being unavailable, there needs to be an option for those with no other options.
  • Linked to rescue for placeable horses.
  • Absolutly! The cost in my area So Cal is about $300.00 now including hauloff.
  • yes. cost of disposal is more than vet cost here in minn.eveyones gotta make a buck - sick world
  • a humane option for ailing horse
  • It is the responsible way to end a life, rather than sending a horse to the torture of slaughter.
  • Absolutely! The California model is excellent!
  • So many people I know iare keepimg unhealthy horse low-cost equine euthansia were widely available.
  • BUT I also think only people who can afford to care provide care their whole lives should have them.
  • So that the owner can do the right thing when the time comes.
  • We ought to have the option of packing houses for horses that are unwanted. They paid for the horse.
  • The cost is $100-$200 now..a drop in the bucket compared to hay prices.
  • I just had to euthanise my 1 yr old Arabian and it cost 431.00
  • Current economic situation merits this. People no longer can care for their horses.
  • This option is critical to keep horses from painful slaughter.
  • It might keep horses owned by people who don't care from starving to death...
  • yes but only if the euthanasia is really necessary and not used just to get rid of unwanted horses
  • more humane than slaughter
  • It is the only humane solution since slalughter is no longer an option. Make anti-slaughter fans pay
  • Money should not be an issue in this decision. Horse welfare should be.
  • With high feed prices,etc. some owners have terrible choices to make. consider the horses
  • If it will save horses from being abused or going to slaughter, DEFINITELY!
  • Euthanasia is a painless way for abused and neglected horses who can't find good homes.
  • with the option to turn adoptable animals over to rescues
  • needs to be VERY low-cost!
  • I feel it would keep down the amount of starved, crippled and unwanted horses.
  • Euthanasia is far more humane than needlessly prolonging a neglected horse's suffering.
  • People who don't know what to do when faced with losing a horse. Some are abandoning them . This wou
  • It is much better to have a horse euthanized or adopted than left to starve.
  • this is a no brainer with the overpopulatin of horses and irresponsible owners and breeders
  • Poor economy, costs of care, and filled rescues. These clinics are very necessary.
  • To Many older unsound horse could have a happier ending
  • But possibly even more important is reasonable carcass disposal options.
  • No affordable options are available...
  • It would cut down on numbers of horses starving to death in pastures due to slaughter house closure.
  • Better yet open up slaughter on horses so you can bring them to local places and have it done humane
  • Depending on the health of the horse and if they are ridable. Good health should not be euthanized j
  • For horses that have no other options and the vet is in agreement that euthanasing is the best thing
  • Have very mixed feelings about this.
  • Guidelines are needed
  • Also horse slaughter should be legalized because the INHUMANE way it's done in Mexico is BARBARIC
  • It is hard enough to lose your best friend--and then have a huge vet bill to deal with . . .
  • Since people suck, we need these clinics for the sake of the horses.
  • need more info
  • not only low cost euthanasia but also carcass disposal too
  • I WOULD RATHER SEE AN ANIMAL PUT DOWN "THE" STAVE TO DEATH!!!!
  • It is far better to have a human alternative than to promt suffering
  • maybe we could eliminate some of the abuse if low cost euthanasia were available
  • a necessart evil....not enough money or facilities to care for all unwanted horses.
  • yes, its better than a slow, painful death by neglect and starvation!
  • Better then the alternative shipping to Mexico
  • what else can we do with older unwanted horses? Can't even sell them for dog food anymore.
  • Absolutely! Too many horses are suffering because owner's can't affoird euthanasia and disposal
  • It certainly beats letting horses die of neglect or other forms of cruelty!
  • You gotta be kidding?
  • No, because there would be too many good horses being put down due to laziness, indifference
  • yes, but the ones that aren't feeding & neglecting won't do it to end the suffering
  • However, the companion problem for many is how to dispose of the carcase.
  • Also disposal.
  • IF MONITORED SO THAT IT IS REALLY NECESSARY AND NOT BEING DONE FOR AN OWNERS CONVIENANCE
  • For the well-being of the horses
  • SICK AND UNADOPTABLE HORSES ONLY
  • Somethig has to be done for these poor animals that aren't wanted since slaughter has been banned.
  • with the overpopulation of unwanted horses, the dumped ones, neglected, Vets, or some intervention
  • No Way!
  • If a horse owner can not afford to feed their horses than how can they afford the cost of euthanasia
  • Many folks let their aging or very ill horses live in pain because they cannot afford to euthanize.
  • It is the kindest thing to do instead of pain and starving
  • This is a key factor in making sale by auction to killer buyers less attractive.
  • help these poor older or injured animals
  • It should be just as available as it is for our dogs & cats when they are too old or in pain.
  • I am so split on this, it really hurts to see horses suffer. But when it is needed yes.
  • Yes, if it would replace slaughtering but adoptions should be 1st.
  • It's inhuman for horses to suffer unnecessarily.
  • This might just save some horses from the feedlots and slaughter houses
  • too many horses suffering out there because of the cost of euthanasia
  • Suffering, starving should not be the end for a horse whose owners run out of resources.
  • if we could get rid of unwanted horse it may save the horse market
  • Much more humane than letting unwanted horses starve!
  • owners would be less likely to allow horses to suffer or to send them to killer sales
  • It is a much more benign and responsible alternative than the mexican slaughterhouses.
  • I believe some horses are left to suffer until death because owners do not have the money
  • Please get this started ASAP!!
  • We need clearing houses around the country where horses can go to be assessed and put down if necess
  • Human euthanasia should be a decision based on economics.
  • It is a humane answer to a growing problem.
  • absolutely better than slaughter, wish it didn't have to be an option but is nec.
  • With the ban of slaughter, some people have no recourse
  • Only if humane treatment is strictly enforced
  • as distasteful as euthanasia of an unwanted animal is, the alternatives can be far, far worse for t
  • If we have put the skids on slaughter - what other reasonable choice is there?
  • Would offer opportunties to educate owners as well as proved a good end for suffering horses.
  • Also, there should be discounts for the disposal. Maybe do both in one central location.
  • Given the time and expense of the procedure most practitioners already discount this service.
  • Need companies for the removal of the body also
  • It's much better than watching them starve to death.
  • I should be available now the the slaughter houses are closed. Less would be left to starve.
  • it's a more humane alternative than Mexican slaughterhouses!!
  • it would save a lot of suffering, and hopefully prevent some abuse from happening
  • a horse shouldn't suffer because it's owner can't afford to put it down
  • Clinics need to be very localized due to lack of transportation by some.
  • Absolutely, and vet must agree that this is best solution or horse goes to rescue facility or....?!
  • Give these horses a better way out than slaughter
  • Inexpensive euthanasia is not the issue for me- it is the dilema of removal of remains.
  • i have paid up to $300 to have a horse put down and it can cost up to $300 to have it disposed of
  • I just put down a pony :( and illegally burried him but not everyone has this option
  • If not able to be resusitated by a humane group humane euthanization is the right choice.
  • And the HSUS should foot all the bills!
  • so owners that can't afford their horses don't dump or neglet them
  • Many horses suffer longer than necessary due to cost of euthanasia and burial/disposal
  • These poor horses can't be left to suffer in death. We can be "humane" by letting them go.
  • There should always be another option
  • The option should be there!
  • Excellent option in the current economic environment
  • With the caveat that rescues will take in healthy animals.
  • I believe it to be a last resource; it's better than a slow death due to neglect or abandonment!
  • Only for obviously terminal or elderly cases.
  • I hope it would end suffering/abuse, maybe lead to saving some horses too
  • Euthanasia carried out only if a Vet prescribes.
  • Horse owners need to factor euthanasia plans (and costs) into their budget BEFORE buying a horse.
  • Yes, by captive bolt. . that and human slaughter houses for all animals.
  • Only under controlled circumstances. Horses should not be 'disposable' items.
  • If there can be a low cost clinic why can't our regular vets perform euthanasia inexpensively?
  • Euthanasia by lag bolt is painless, cheap, and humane.
  • It's the only solution for some horses and owners
  • Absolutely! As a horse lover, we '
  • This might help slow down negelect & starvation of older horses
  • and burial services
  • without slaughter houses we are overwhelmed with unwanted horses
  • WOuld improve the welfare of suffering animals
  • How better to honor those that serve us than to let them go with dignity
  • well we have to do something since we can't count on the Law ot Goverment to do the right thing !
  • This would help with the amount of hurting horses out there.
  • Its a zillion times more humane than slaughter and its better than the horse suffering in neglect
  • Makes it too easy for heartless owners to get rid of performance horses past their peak
  • Too many people let horses suffer as they can't afford treatment or to put the horse to sleep.
  • Its better than going to the killer.
  • Horses are 'dumped' in my area. Stables find new horses left in their barns in the morning.
  • This is one of the hardest issues for horse owners - Yes!!
  • euthanasia should should be used for non recoverable diseases and to limit their suffering
  • as a rescue operator, if people had an option, maybe horses wouldn't be left to starve
  • IT'S BETTER HORSES/ANY ANIMAL TO BE HUMANELY EUTHANIZED THAN STARVED OR NOT GIVEN MEDICAL CARE
  • You still have to dispose of the remains; sometimes that's another issue in itself!
  • yes, if slaughter ban stays,better than starving
  • end needless suffering
  • that is if the horse is crippled or so old that its losing weight and if there is no choice for some
  • It is better than abandoning them but some might be too quick to use it
  • Slaughter bans also need to be lifted.
  • There should be a humane way to put you big animals to rest, not everyone wants to shoot their own
  • More people would do the right thing if this option were available.
  • The alternative is worse - neglect and possible cruelty
  • as long as horses are treated with kindness & respect.Owners also
  • i think this is a horrible but necessary situation for owners that have no other options.
  • better to use euthanasia than people sending the horses to slaughter or just neglecting them
  • this would cut down on the number of neglected horses left out in pasture
  • In tough times people who cant sell or afford to keep the horse need a humane altermative.
  • Only for sick or injured horses, not because owners can't afford them. That's just plain killing!
  • What we really need is humane slaughter houses.
  • Yes
  • since HSPCA and Gov't are trying to limit my options
  • lower cost: certainly, clinics? No
  • Yes!! This would save a lot of horses from being starved or turned loose due to lack of money.
  • the meat needs to be used. Put it back into dog food. Our dogs are starving for nutrition
  • There is a hay shortage in our area, prices are up and horses are already being neglected
  • Hopely this will allow people to end the lives of horses with dignity.
  • It may be an incentive for an owner to do the right thing.
  • Absolutely! That would end the slaughter houses.
  • and they should reverse the decision to close the slaughter houses w/strict inspections
  • Vets are too greedy so start w-lowering euth cost and go from there.
  • More affordable options for horse owners could equal less neglect
  • Any shipping/starvation alternative needs to have consideration
  • Low costs may equal lower standards. Who is going to donate meds/time/disposal? You?
  • It is hard enough to do the right thing for your beloved horse without incurring great expense.
  • certainly is better than allowing suffering, or starvation and turning loose, etc.
  • infinitely better solution than turning a horse on public land to starve
  • it is a crime we don't help those in need
  • But should be closely regulated to insure that the guidelines are upheld and the option's not abused
  • without slaughter operations, this is a necessity
  • Euthanasia should only be used in necessary events, having them give owner's a chance to
  • A wonderful, kind option
  • absolutely.
  • A well-placed .22 slug is available, humane, and cheap already
  • Yes, but this needs to be regulated so abuses don't occur.
  • Each horse euthanasia should be an individualized decision.
  • For aged and/or physically/mentally infirm equines only.
  • Vet and disposal costs are more than many people can afford today.
  • Since the Fed. made slaughter illegal they should pay for euthanasia and disposal of unwanted horses
  • Horses are being turned out onto the highways,or left in pastures to starve and die.
  • I think careful measures would need to be made to make sure that its not abused.
  • Vet supervised for people who can't afford it under normal prices
  • Much better to euthanize than send to an auction!!!
  • What a sad reflection of our economy, but far more humane than the alternatives.
  • But only for terminally ill horses, Not becasue people can't afford them anymore!
  • but with strict controls to validate ownership and authority to euthanize
  • Yes, I think it would stop a lot of horses facing the stress of transportation to slaughterhouses an
  • I think it would make it too easy to just get rid of unwanted horses instead of finding a good home
  • A quality of life deemed merciful.
  • But only for the very old and ill as a humane resource
  • And only used by Veternarian "REFERAL". Hopefully this would elimate abuse by the public!
  • It also takes the planning out of it - many people can't cope with the emotions, so wait too long.
  • It is the only humane approach. In this economy a lot of horses will be starving to death.
  • I think you should reopen the slaugher houses!!!
  • Only for those that "need" to be put down...sick or too old and health failing.
  • Australia should have them as so many people here have them slaughtered which is barbaric & cruel.
  • I think this is just so much more humane than the alternatives. Sad, but humane.
  • when faced with the economic loss of a horse the cost of euthanasia just adds to the stress
  • As much as I love horses, available euthanasia of some type is necessary.
  • Much kinder than leaving horses to starve to death.
  • it would help control the unwanted and ailing and aging horse population
  • It would help so much with older or sick horses that would require expensive vet bills.
  • Yes - even though what's the difference between slaughter and euthanasia? Slaughter = meat at least
  • Yes, sadly, very sadly, yes
  • Only if it is the only option for the horse, not just owner conv.
  • sad but with slaughter banned this is needed
  • it would be better then letting an animal suffer before dieing
  • Betterto put them down then basically throw them away
  • slaughter houses are a necessary evil.All domesticated animals suffer the abuse, neglect, and irresp
  • As much as I hate to say yes., it is better than haviing these horse going to Mexico and being stabb
  • It's the ONLY way out of the current dilemma.
  • I honestly think that is an easy way out. There should be other options available.
  • very much! it would help stressed income people to humanely put their sick and old horses to rest.
  • To many unwanted horses are left to suffer due to human neglect
  • What are people to do who can't afford an aged horse, have tried and failed to find it a home?
  • people should not have to take their horse to auction because it's cheaper than euthanasia
  • a sad reality and necessity
  • But the biggest problem is corpse disposal
  • Giving horse owners the option should give horses humane treatment for their last hours
  • It is humane; we don't need anymore horses going to Candad and Mexico!
  • We must do the human thing for our beloved animals when faced with no alturnitives
  • would be a better way to an end that suffering from starvation
  • Yes! We need alternatives to slaughter. What did they do 100 yrs ago, burried them!
  • How do we dispose of all those unusable, toxic carcasses?
  • Should help eliminate slaughter trucks
  • Sure. It is a great idea. Hope to never have to use one.
  • But only for debilitated horses or dangerous ones--and truely dangerous not mishandled!
  • Something needs to be done to the unwanted horses.
  • but adequate disposal systems have to be in place also
  • An option to allow folks to make a humane decision rather than auction & slaughter
  • as long as this helps the suffering of sick and injured horses
  • but not for other wise healthy horses, only sick and crippled and dangerous horses.
  • Yes as analterative to neglect/abuse
  • We need to face reality, unwanted horses are going to suffer worse from starvation and neglect.
  • I am concerned that it may be a way of irresponsible people just getting rid of unwanted horses.
  • Better than terrifying slaughter house- horses know , glad slaughter is banned
  • To help eliminate the amount of neglected horses now suffering from the slaughter ban.
  • also disposel
  • good concept! How are animals transported from the clinic & to where?
  • I recently had to euthanize my 28yr old morgan due to poor health. It cost our family almost $1000.
  • Not only the euthanasia but disposal: keeping my 3 aged mares another year would have been cheaper
  • As an alternative to slaughter, or starvation? Absolutely!
  • send the bill to PETA
  • Better to put a horse down than let them starve to death from abandonment!!!!!
  • This choice could greatly relieve suffering in horses; from illness that is not treated, old age ,et
  • Until the horse population is fully controlled and accounted for, this should be an option.
  • the clinic must see that horse needs to be euth'd
  • ahh, yeah. It's much better than starving neglected horses that owners can give away or feed
  • The slaughter houses should be reformed and reopened. There are to many horse and no enough rescues.
  • to encourage people to take more responsibility for their horses
  • Euthanasia is far more humane than letting and old or injured horse remain. And yes it is hard to s
  • Then people have no excuse to humanely put their horse down.
  • The cost of euthanasia and disposal is way to expensive for the average horse owner.
  • Yes many horses that suffer are not put down for soley economic reasons.
  • ABSOLUTELY!!!! Then at least THAT excuse would be gone...
  • Especially since the perceived "high cost" of Euthanasia is used by supporters of horse slaughter
  • Horse owners have to have a humane option for their horses that they can no longer care for.
  • Much better than a slow death
  • If the health of the horse and/or its quality of life then I agree.
  • I would rather see vets offer a lower cost euthanasia when the horse really needs it.
  • For sickness, yes... but disposal also, as not everybody can bury their horse in their pasture.
  • ...but where do the bodies go?
  • This could at least ease the pain for some owners in the economical realm.
  • Yes! ANYTHING to reduce inhumane slaughter of horses!
  • Vets should not profit on this service, period
  • People should do the right thing but they don't so assist them with the decision.
  • I think low-cost euthanasia should be available, but not clinics dedicated to such.
  • As a responsponsible horse owner, we need it when no other options remain.
  • What else ya gonna do with 'em? The do gooders did away with the slaughter plants! (Idiots!)
  • yes but not used as method to get rid of unwanted horses in good health
  • then people could NOT use the cost as their excuse! Be responsible!
  • Since all of the US slaughter houses have been closed, this will hopefully be a humane end to some h
  • it would help alleviate a lot of suffering
  • I like the idea of rehoming healthy, unwanted horses turned in at such a clinic.
  • something needs to be done to help stop suffering & excuses for it; sofar this is the best I've seen
  • More humane than slaughter
  • Old, sick, unmanageable horses-better than slaughter
  • This is really tough question, I do not think there is an easy solution to this situation
  • if used the the right purpose
  • As long as a release is signed allowing for useable horses to be placed.
  • MOST people are not prepared OR WILL NOT deal with that issue. THEY need help!
  • Too bad people won't stop breeding and preventing unwanted babies.
  • ABSOLUTELY!!! fewer horses would be put through hell...
  • I have really mixed feelings about this. No animal should suffer, but they shouldn't be killed arbi
  • Owners need to rebudget at their own expense, not their animals.
  • There has to be a way to help control the # of unwanted horses.
  • I know people who have said they cannot afford to euthanize their horses.
  • It is important for the sake of the horse not to cause undue suffering and/or starving be condoned.
  • Most emphatically YES! If it didn't cost so much more people would use it.
  • This is an important humane issue.
  • It is one way to prevent countless animals from dying terrifying deaths in slaughterhouses
  • If there was a vet to determine if the horse needed to be euthanized they would be good.
  • No slaughter=many unwanted and unusable horses. better option than abandonment.
  • Low Cost for Sick, Crippled, Severely Injured: YES / Oherwise NO - not an escape route for finances
  • what are we going to do with all the aging/hurtanimals now that slaughter is banned???
  • YES!!! had a friend who couldn't afford $350 for this, horse "put down" with gun. AWFUL!!
  • Hard question but if all attempts to find home fail, it's for the best
  • With the high cost of feed/board, great alternative for owners
  • If people could affored it maybe fewer horses will be starved to death.
  • It's better than dying the horrible death at a slaughter horse, this is a great idea.
  • Give horses the respect they deserve by a humane death.
  • If it is a choice to either euthanize or commit the horse to a lifetime of misery - euthanasia wins
  • But, should be used as a last resort.
  • Absolutely. The loss of equine slaughterhouses has caused huge problems.
  • If the the choice is starvation or euthanasia, the answer is obvious. We must not let horses suffer.
  • Only for unadoptable horses, a much better option than slaughter.
  • It's hard when money makes a hard decision more difficult
  • My ver charges $250.00 and it costs another $250.00 to have the body removed. Who can afford it.
  • They should be offerred at Non-Profit rescue locations so that any useful animals can be surrendered
  • Yes, now that humane slaughter is no longer an option!
  • Yes, but only if disposal of remains is also low cost and available
  • More humane than starvation or sending to the slaughter house
  • absolutely!
  • I don't think that the cost of putting a horse down is the issue though - more the owners attachment
  • It is more humane than allowing horses to starve because people can't afford to keep them
  • Better for the horse to have an adoption option or to be humanely euthenized that to suffer.
  • Owners need a financially viable option so horses don't suffer
  • Absolutely!
  • very humane
  • Absolutely. There would be less abandonment of old/sick animals
  • Absolutely, there is a need for this.
  • I think it would help with the growing problem of neglected/starving animals.
  • Absolutely, there is a need for this.
  • I WANT TO KNOW WHERE MY DEAR, SWEET, HORSES GO WHEN THEIR TIME COMES.LOW COST WOULD HELP SO MANY
  • We need an inexpensive but humane way for our many unwanted horses.
  • low cost, yes but clinics? that is sad
  • too many questions: who picks up the rest of the tab - smalltown vets can't always subsidize . . .
  • Only for those that are very sick,old & owners are neglecting care after efforts are made to adopt 1
  • it is preferable to the current "shipping to Mexico"
  • Considering the alternative (starvation & neglect). It looks like we have to go that way.
  • How about low-cost medical care nstead.
  • We have to do something quick for unwanted equine, the ivory tower folks took away the captive bolt.
  • Since we no longer have slaughter there needs to be an alternative
  • i've too many horses in the killer pens that should have been euthanasied if the cost had been less.
  • humane necessity
  • absolutely! until this country can reopen the equine slaughter business, using humane regulations.
  • Yes, but people need to man up and be responsible for every horse they own, cheap euthanasia or not.
  • Humane euthansia is better alternative than pain, suffering, abandonment
  • beats slaughter
  • Absolutely! Why let the poor things suffer until they die when people can't afford high vet costs?
  • Sadly, there really are fates worse than death.
  • Absolutely, this is an emergency necessity, too many horses are being starved to death.
  • Its what we assured horse owners would be available when we took away the slaughter option.
  • Not for healthy horses, only for ill or crippled
  • Lacking the traditional livestock market for unwanted horses this type service is very important
  • absolutely.
  • It's the DUTY of equine stewards to euth kindly when appropr. It's costly! This helps good owners.
  • It would save countless horses suffering simply because owners cannot afford the kindest goodbye.
  • more humane
  • Unfortunately necessary due to overpopulation
  • some of us cannot afford to pay the vet for disposal also.
  • There is the reality of too many animals and too few options for many owners.Hard choice,but a need
  • A MUST!
  • but who pays for the disposal of the body after the fact.?
  • It gets back to making good choices before we bring a horse home to start with. Be responsible.
  • the big expense is having a backhoe dig a hole for burial will clinic have a method of disposal
  • It would help eliminate a horses suffering if an owner can't take care of it. Thanks PETA.
  • This certainly beats slaughter
  • Too many horses are suffering due to slaughter houses not accepting horses
  • This would give owners an option instead of letting an unknown person take the horse.
  • beats starving them to death
  • maybe not widely but at least regionally available
  • And PETA required to dispose of the body
  • Disposal of the body should be included in all clinics.
  • Surely better that horses left running wild to starve to death!
  • preferable to horses being abandoned or starved
  • ALSO: Breeders, trainers, owners must responsibly produce horses capable of useful lives.
  • It's much better than having your old friend suffer in the field or shipping him off to slaughter.
  • ESPECIALLY with ther not being any slaughter!!
  • I do think low-cost equine euthanasia should be available when needed not just during "a clinic."
  • bring back humane slaughter!
  • Drug companies should provide vets with the medication for this at their cost.
  • Some horse owners are in financial crisis and would rather put their horses down than send them out
  • It would be more humane than shipping, slaughter, etc.
  • better than people turning them loose or abandoning them to starve
  • Absolutely. This is a more humane choice then a slaughter house in Canada Or Mexico
  • Absolutely YES!!! This would be a reasonable alternative to current options.
  • Having a horse humanely distroyed is kinder than abandonment
  • not sure who should foot the bill..those against slaughter possibly
  • Yes, as long as the rules ARE followed and the horses are NOT adoptable.
  • should be an option, although if you can feed it each month you should be able to pay for euthanasia
  • Horrified that it's offered as a simple option to the expense of ownership!!!
  • It is better to HUMANELY euthanize them than starve, abuse or slaughter them.
  • In the name of all that is humane, yes!
  • I believe (HOPE) that people would do the Humane thing for their horses if it were afordable
  • stop overbreeding.It is unethical for rescues to buy healthy at auction horses to then euth
  • Yes! Absolutely!
  • The cost of burial, cremation, disposing of the body is greater than the cost of euthanasia.
  • Absolutely mandatory. Prevents the agony of slaugher and the ills associated with that industry.
  • And the fools in Washington should foot the bill for the cost!!!
  • But emaciated animals like the one n the photo should be rehabiliated if possible not dispatched.
  • Lining up horses for euthanasia may be more humane, but for my horse it will be private and calm
  • Rather than suffer yes. Would you offer body disposal as well??...
  • For horses that are clearly unmarketable for various reasons (neglect;abuse;health)
  • It's better than the aution route for elderly and failing horses
  • Especially in these times
  • Absolutely.
  • What has this world come to??!!
  • Now more than ever with the passage of the no slaughter law.
  • It would be too easy for people to just get rid of unwanted horses
  • Vets should be allowed to euthanize as needed and have as tax write-off
  • There are times when euthanasia is necessary
  • Horses should be humanely killed, but their meat should be USED (dog food, export to Europe, etc.).
  • The costs of rendering is astronomical, $275. Then vet fees of $235. Puts the cost over $500
  • especially when a vet has cared for the horse a good part of its life
  • Personally, I don't care what it would cost, but some people would rather starve a horse than spend
  • Yes, but who/how is going to dispose of all the bodies????
  • People can finally put down old backyard Bessie, and put her out of her misery!
  • This is a great idea. I would like to open one in MN
  • yes because the dignity of quality of life versus the quanity of life is perserved
  • YES, SO THEY DO NOT GO TO SLAUGHTER
  • I think that low cost euthanasia should be available but not in a clinic setting.
  • It should be an option for owners of infirmed, unwanted, or otherwise unadoptable horses.
  • In my area ity costs about $300 to euthanize a horse and another $400 to have the body removed

About the Author

Erin Ryder

Erin Ryder is a former news editor of The Horse: Your Guide To Equine Health Care.

Stay on top of the most recent Horse Health news with FREE weekly newsletters from TheHorse.com. Learn More

Free Newsletters

Sign up for the latest in:

From our partners